Four classic formulas compared
The formulas share the same structure but use different base weights and per-inch slopes, which is why they disagree more at height extremes.
| Formula | Reference weight | BMI at that weight | vs median | Equation |
|---|
Compare Devine, Robinson, Miller and Hamwi side by side, place them against the adult BMI 18.5–24.9 reference band, inspect the formula spread, choose a BMI target, and optionally see how your current weight relates—without pretending any one equation defines a personally perfect weight.
The formulas share the same structure but use different base weights and per-inch slopes, which is why they disagree more at height extremes.
| Formula | Reference weight | BMI at that weight | vs median | Equation |
|---|
Exact BMI weight is compared with the 2016 Peterson linear approximation, which was designed to align target-body-weight equations with BMI across height.
See how the classic formula median and BMI 18.5–24.9 reference band move around your height. This makes the formulas’ linear slopes visible.
| Height | Formula median | Formula range | BMI 18.5–24.9 |
|---|
Optional only. BMI is a screening measure, not a diagnosis, and it does not distinguish fat mass from lean mass.
All four classic equations use kilograms and total height in inches. Δin = height − 60 in.